Friday, June 23, 2023

we need both

We talked before about justification (by faith alone in Christ alone) and new birth. We are justified in God's sight – declared righteous by Him – when we do not work, but believe (Romans 4:5). We have life through His (Christ's) name when we believe (John 20:31). Both are true, but they aren't the same.

There's a temptation when we talk about this sort of thing to err in one of two directions: either we confound two distinct things and blur them together in our minds, or we put them in opposition to one another, and try to force ourselves to choose between them. The proper path is to recognize that we need both, but to understand at the same time that they're not the same thing.

So we understand that being justified in God's sight – being declared righteous by Him – is our guarantee against damnation. God cannot condemn the one He has already declared is righteous. So there's a sense where our eternal destiny is determined by whether we work, or whether we simply believe without works.

At exactly the same time, we understand that we need not only God's judicial acquittal (so that we cannot be condemned in His sight), but we need to be changed. We have an ontological need as well as  forensic need. It's not merely that we need to be acquitted, we need to be changed too. We recognize that we aren't what we need to be, and we recognize too that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 15:50). We need an entirely new life to see it (John 3:3).

It's important that we don't confuse what Scripture says about these two things.  We can search the Scriptures all we like, but we cannot find a single test in Scripture to tell whether we have been justified in God's sight. We can find Scriptural support for the idea that new life in Christ has produces results (1 John 3:9, 14, 24), but I cannot find a "test" of whether we are justified by Him. 

As far as I can tell, whenever someone says, "God be merciful to me a sinner," God does exactly that. That self-confessed sinner goes home justified (Luke 18:13–14). This is the foundation of our assurance before Him. We can be confident before God, because we know that He is the God who justifies the ungodly (Romans 4:5). We are confident that He has heard and He has acted when we say, "God have compassion on me, the sinner." We have nothing to fear when we have told Him the truth and stopped calling Him a liar.

But at the same time, we check ourselves against what He says about the life He has given us. Are we living that life? Is that something we have received, but are content to leave in the package, so to speak?  We are called not merely to have eternal life, but to "lay hold" on it (1 Timothy 6:12). 

And this brings us to an entirely different view of the Christian path. On the one hand, we must be content to call out, "God be merciful to me a sinner" and be confident that He has done exactly that. On the other, we recognize that eternal life requires feeding, as all life does. No living thing, except God Himself, can just go on without feeding. The eternal life we receive from God requires feeding too, which is really what John 6:35–58 is all about. We need not only to have eaten (John 6:53), but also to eat (John 6:56). There is, indeed a one-time eating, but there is also an ongoing feeding. We need both.

Again – we can't stress this enough – being righteous in God's sight has nothing to do with how well live after that. Having once been declared righteous, God no longer counts any sins against us (Romans 4:6–8). That's true regardless how we live from that point on.

Walking in newness of life isn't a result of fear of judicial retribution. We don't walk in newness of life because we're making atonement for our sins, nor because we're trying to acquire merit to buy our place in Heaven. Walking in newness of life is a result of Christ in us. We yearn to walk newly (I really don't think that's a correct use of the word) because He has worked something new in us (Philippians 2:13). And this isn't merely a "New Testament truth," it's taught in the Old Testament too: fallen men and women need a new heart (Deuteronomy 29:1–4).

So my exhortation to us – and I really do mean "us" here, I need to hear this as much as anyone does – is, don't let's lose sight of either truth. On the one hand, we are justified in God's sight without works when we believe Him. At exactly the same time, God works in us to produce something new: and it starts with His giving us new life. We can't work our way into new life, it's impossible to earn eternal life. But the eternal life He has given us freely grows and develops and matures into something very different than what we are by nature as Adam's children.

We need to hold on to both these truths.

16 comments:

HandWrittenWord said...

Mark --

Consider your (as usual) excellent remarks in light
of this passage:

If ye then be risen with Christ,
seek those things which are above,
where Christ sitteth on
the right hand of God.
Set your affection on things above,
not on things on the earth,
For ye are dead, and your life
is hid with Christ in God.
When Christ, who is our life,
shall appear, then shall ye also
appear with him in glory.
Colossians 3:1-4

If I truly BELIEVE and OBEY that, considering every detail
to the depths of my being, what form will the dilemma take?
Does the dilemma still exist?

Robert said...

Mark - what are your thoughts on where James 2:18-26 fits?

Susan said...

Philippians 3:9

Robert said...

Thank you Susan. I agree. I take it v.7 refers to the conversion of Saul and v. 9 is an advance on that. The moment he believed, he was counted righteous but, some 30 years later, he wanted to be found in Him not having his own righteousness. So that it was all about Christ living through him and not about him impressing others with His attainments.

I once attended a reading on James when I was around the age of 19 and a brother made the comment, ‘of course when James speaks about faith works he is not talking about us cutting the neighbours grass’. I don’t know what the US/Canadian phrase is - helping your neighbour with the yardwork? Anyway, there was an immediate outcry from other brethren and they made it clear that helping your neighbour with yardwork was a sign of salvation. I pondered that reading often until one day, I saw that the two examples of Abraham and Rahab cited by James defy human logic. The one would be regarded as a heinous murder, the other as an act of treason. Both examples would repel the unbeliever who has no life from God.

This article from Mark is very helpful but needs us all to unpick it and consider it carefully. My own observation is that because of poor gospel preaching, many do not get a good start on the Christian pathway and therefore are not clear that they have been justified. Paul starts with that in his exposition of the gospel. Our gospel preachers may never get around to it! Many are saying to God, ‘make me as one of thy hired servants’ when they should be rejoicing in the truth, ‘this my son is alive’.

Susan said...

"For we are His workmanship, having been created in Christ Jesus for good works, ... The beginning of all excellence is to confess that we have none. J. N. Darby

Susan said...

HWW - Dilemma solved as we set our minds on Christ above the Holy Spirit produces His fruit: the life of the Lord Jesus in and through us.

welcome back - you were missed

hard to type (as well as many other things) as I fell and broke my right arm and in a cast. I am weak but He is strong

clumsy ox said...

Robert, I’m glad you brought up James 2. That passage has been in the back of my mind.

Romans 4:1–5 quotes Genesis 15:6 as evidence that faith without works is justifying faith. James also quotes Genesis 15:6 (James 2:23) and alludes to Genesis 22 (James 2:21). James connects the two with the word “fulfilled” (James 2:23), Genesis 15:6 was “fulfilled” in Genesis 22:9ff. In fact, the faith Abram had in Genesis 15 was “perfected” (James 2:22) in Genesis 22.

So there is a progression (“fulfilled” and “perfected” both point to progression) from the faith of Genesis 15 to the faith of Genesis 22. The question is, when are we justified? Romans 4:1–5 is clear that we are justified before God with Genesis 15 faith, James 2:14ff is clear that we’re justified before man with Genesis 22 faith (see James 2:18).

Or, as one friend of mine says, if faith without works is dead (James 2:20), and faith without works justifies (Romans 4:5), then we conclude that dead faith justifies.

One of my daughters says it a little differently: “faith without works is dead, but it’s still faith.”

One thing worth noting: J. B. Stoney points out that Genesis 22 comes many years (maybe as many as 40 years) after Genesis 15 (New Ministry, Volume 2, p. 31). We need to be careful rushing that progression.

It's also worth remembering that James gives two examples of justification by works: Abraham (James 2:21–23) and Rahab (James 2:25). In both cases, the person’s works were despicable: Rahab committed treason, Abraham attempted human (child) sacrifice. James isn’t using a Sunday-school standard for measuring these works. We should be very, very careful when we attempt to judge someone’s faith by their works. We might find ourselves unable to judge the faithfulness of those works in the same light the Spirit of God does.

I realize my thoughts are a bit scattered here. And I'm sure they're entirely unoriginal. I insist that the Christian life follows justification in God's sight, but there might be a very long time before we produce discernible proof of faith in our daily walk. And it might be very difficult for others to see it for what it is.

Robert said...

So, I too am providing scattered thoughts. For many years I belonged to the Luther camp that dismissed James as a 'straw epistle' that is more suited to being attached to Acts than towards the end of the NT as we have it in our English translations.

I find your statement very helpful: 'So there is a progression (“fulfilled” and “perfected” both point to progression) from the faith of Genesis 15 to the faith of Genesis 22'.

I also find the, ‘justified before God by faith/justified by works before men’, argument difficult to accept. As we both have pointed out, men would never accept the acts of Abraham and Rahab as acts of faith. Imagine if they were the headline in today's newspapers - 'man arrested in Israel for trying to kill his son, claims God told him to do it' or 'woman arrested in Ukraine for passing on military secrets to Russia claims God told her Russia will conquer her land'.

It is also interesting that both cases may have taken 40 years to come to fulfilment, depending on how we read Joshua chapter 2 and when news of the crossing of the Red Sea reached Jericho. Also, in both cases there were only two witnesses to the faith of Abraham and Rahab.

Therefore, it seems a very long time for faith to show itself to men, and only two of them, for justification to come by works.

Another random thought is that Kelly argues for the translation 'faith without works is 'idle' instead of 'dead'.

So this is where I am in my thinking - I believe both instances cited by James refer to justification by faith and by works before God. I would have cited the woman with an issue of blood as an example. Then I read your quote from JB Stoney and discovered that he does the same!

“I have not been speaking of conscience of sin, but of conscience of the benefit I have received. I believe there are hundreds and thousands of people all over the world who, if they were to go down on their knees, and tell the Lord that He was their Saviour, would rise up perfectly happy. They know the value of the blood, but they have never told the Lord what it is to them, so they have never heard Him say to them as He did to the woman in Luke, and to other women, "Thy faith hath saved thee, go in peace"; and He speaks in just the same way to the leper who returned.

And, besides this, there is not only the necessity of telling the Lord, but there is the benefit of acting up to your own impressions. When you act in accordance with your impressions you always strengthen your impressions; if you do not act in accordance with them you make an infidel of yourself. There may be any length of time between the faith and the act, but it is always the act which proves the measure of the faith. There is forty years difference between James and Paul; between the works that proved the faith, and the faith that brought forth the works." JB Stoney



Susan said...

Oh -the work of The Word...

2 Timothy 3:16-17
New American Standard Bible 1995
16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.

HandWrittenWord said...

Susan -

Thanks for the kind words.

May the lord continue to bless you
in all Spiritual understanding.

I will pray for swift and complete
healing for your arm.

Anonymous said...

The point about “before God” vs “before man” is compelling. Now I’m rethinking that.

-mark

Anonymous said...

Our father abraham gives you an idea of who's being addressed they were like the law observant hebrews in the book of hebrews and not yet post cross Christians.

Susan said...

Anonymous - good point - we must view Scripture rightly divided

Anonymous said...

Thanks Susan
http://www.gracebiblestudies.org/Message.aspx?MessageID=339

Robert said...

Yes - important to see that distinction.

James writes to ‘the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad’ while Peter addresses the strangers who are ‘elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ’.

Anonymous said...

It is marvellous that so many should hold as head of the church among the Gentiles Peter, who was the apostle of the circumcision, and who openly left the work amongst the heathen to Paul, who had already laboured in it independently for more than fourteen years, sent and blessed by the Lord and by the Holy Ghost, without any reference to Peter, and who had moreover expressly rejected Peter's authority, which the false brethren sought to impose upon the Gentile churches. Peter, though greatly blessed by the Lord, is the apostle of the circumcision, and of the circum- cision only; Paul, of the uncircumcision, that is, of the Gentiles. Paul alone among the apostles speaks of the church, the body of Christ: this truth was confided only to him as its administrator.

Verse 11. Paul recalls another case; one in which he had been compelled to reprove and withstand Peter, who had come to Antioch, where the church had been founded among the Gentiles, though there were Jews among them also. Poor Peter! he shewed himself at the beginning quite ready to eat with the Gentiles, being free from the prejudices of his countrymen; but alas! when certain came down from Jerusalem, from James, who was the leader of the work and of the assembly in the civil and religious capital of the Jews, where the law was still observed by the Christians- then Peter, full of ardour but sensitive to the opinion of others, and timid in the presence of reproach, with- draws, and no longer eats with the Gentiles.

This was to destroy the divine work, which had already been wrought at Jerusalem-an evident act of unfaithfulness. The more a man is honoured-and in this case there was true ground for respect-the greater the stumbling-block to others if he fail; and thus it happened here. All the Jews, and even Barnabas also, dissembled with Peter, and no longer dared to eat with the Gentiles.

Bible Treasury vol 13 p297